ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[ G.R. No. 128054. January 26, 1999]

KILOSBAYAN, INC. et al. vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS et al.

EN BANC

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JAN 26, 1999.

G.R. No. 128054. (Kilosbayan, Inc., Fernando A. Santiago, Quintin S. Doromal, Emilio S. Capulong, Jr., and Rafael G. Fernando, petitioners, vs. Commission on Elections, Salvador Enriquez, Franklin Drilon, Cesar Sarino, Leonora V. de Jesus, Tiburcio Relucio, Ronaldo V. Puno, Benito R. Catindig, Manuel Calupitan III, Vicente Carlos, Francisco Cancio, Jimmy Durante and Melvyn Mendoza, respondents.)

After carefully perusing the motion for reconsideration filed by herein petitioners, of our en banc decision in Kilosbayan, Inc. et al vs. Commission on Elections, et al, dated October 16, 1997 (280 SCRA 892), we find no reason to grant the same, it appearing that the arguments raised in said motion for reconsideration are either but a mere rehash of those that have been passed upon in the decision, or involve an attack on our factual findings which we will not disturb.

ACCORDINGLY, the motion for reconsideration is hereby DENIED for lack of merit.

Very truly yours,

LUZVIMINDA D. PUNO

Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE