ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[ G.R. No. 135581. January 18, 1999]

SEA PALACE RESTAURANT, et al. vs. SEC. OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT, et al.

SECOND DIVISION

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JAN 18, 1999.

G.R. No. 135581 (Sea Palace Restaurant, et al. vs. Hon. Secretary of Labor and Employment, et al.)

In accordance with the provisions of Rule 45 governing appeals by certiorari to the Supreme Court, and Rule 65, in relation to Rules 46 and 56, governing petitions for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus, as amended and provided in the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure effective July 1. 1997, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the following requirements shall be entertained:

1. full payment upon the filing of the petition of the prescribed docket and other lawful fees, together with the deposit for costs, within the reglementary period, unless the petitioner has theretofore done so:

2. appropriate service of a copy of the petition upon the adverse party or parties and on the lower court, tribunal, agency or entity concerned, with the required proof of service thereof:

3. a clearly legible duplicate original, or a certified true copy of the judgment, final order or resolution certified by the clerk of court of the court a quo or the official authorized to do so:

4. a verified statement indicating the material dates when notice of the judgment, final order or resolution was received, when a motion for new trial or reconsideration, if any, was filed, and when notice of the denial thereof was received; and

5. a certification under oath by petitioner that he has not theretofore commenced any other action involving the same issues in the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, or different divisions thereof, or any other tribunal or agency, if there is such other action or proceeding, he must state the status of the same; and if he should thereafter learn that a similar action has been filed or is pending before the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, or different divisions thereof, of any other tribunal or agency, he undertakes to promptly inform the aforesaid courts and other tribunal or agency thereof within five (5) days therefrom.

On the basis of the foregoing, the Court RESOLVES to DISMISS the petition for certiorari for non-compliance with the above-mentioned requirement nos. 3 and 5, the petitioners having failed to submit copies of the assailed resolutions duly certified by the proper official whose authority and designation are properly indicated, and a certification, duly executed by the petitioners themselves, that no other action or proceeding involving the same issues raised in this case has been filed or is pending before this Court, the Court of Appeals of any other tribunal or agency.

Petitioners' urgent manifestation and compliance dated December 29, 1998 submitting the proof of service of a copy of the foregoing petition on the Office of the Solicitor General is NOTED.

Very truly yours,

TOMASITA M. DRIS

Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE