ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[ G.R. No. 136156. January 18, 1999]

E. TEDDY H. BANAYOS III vs. NLRC, et al.

SECOND DIVISION

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JAN 18, 1999.

G.R. No. 136156 (E. Teddy H. Banayos III vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al.)

Consistent with the pronouncement of this Court in St. Martin Funeral Home vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al. G.R. No. 130866, September 16, 1998, that all references in the amended Section 9 of B.P. No. 129 to supposed appeals from the National Labor Relations Commission to the Supreme Court are interpreted to mean and refer to petitions for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, and that consequently, all such petitions should henceforth be initially filed in the Court of Appeals in strict observance of the doctrine on the hierarchy of courts as the appropriate forum for the relief desired, the Court RESOLVES to REFER petitioner's motions for extension of time to file a petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals for appropriate action and disposition.

Very truly yours,

TOMASITA M. DRIS

Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE