ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[ G.R. No. 138224. July 14, 1999]

COL. MAGNO M. VALDEZ vs. ANGELICA M. BAYLON, et al.

SECOND DIVISION

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JUL 14, 1999.

G.R. No. 138224 (Col. Magno M. Valdez vs. Angelica M. Baylon and Norma V. Castillo.)

In accordance with Rule 45 in relation to Rule 56 and other pertinent provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing appeals by certiorari to the Supreme Court, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court RESOLVES to DENY the petition for review on certiorari for petitioner's failure to:

a) properly verify the petition in accordance with Section 4, Rule 7 in relation to Section 1, Rule 45, as a consequence of which the said petition is treated as an unsigned pleading which under Section 3, Rule 7, produces no legal effect;

b) submit a verified statement of the date of receipt of the assailed resolutions of the Ombudsman pursuant to Sections 4 (b) and 5, Rule 45 in relation to Section 5 (d), Rule 56; and

c) attach clearly legible duplicate original or certified true copies of the assailed resolutions of the Ombudsman in accordance with Sections 4 (d) and 5, Rule 45 in relation to Sec. 5 [d], Rule 56.

Very truly yours,

TOMASITA B. MAGAY-DRIS

Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE