ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[ G.R. No. 138600. July 12, 1999]

JULIETA C. AGDA vs. ERLINDA G. BLANDO, et al.

SECOND DIVISION

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JUL 12, 1999.

The motion of petitioner for extension of thirty (30) days from 15 May 1999 within which to file petition for review on certiorari is GRANTED.

In accordance with Rule 45 in relation to Rule 56 and other pertinent provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing appeals by certiorari to the Supreme Court, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court RESOLVES to DENY the petition for review on certiorari for failure to:

(a) submit an affidavit of service of the petition on respondents and the Court of Appeals executed by the party serving containing a full statement of the date, place and manner of service in accordance with Section 13, Rule 13 in relation to Section 3, Rule 46 and Section 2, Rule 56; and

(b) state the material date of filing of the motion for reconsideration of the questioned decision of the Court of Appeals in accordance with Sections 4(b) and 5, Rule 45 in relation Section 5(d), Rule 56. Petitioner is informed that she may CLAIM from the Collecting and Disbursing Officer of this Court the amount of P80.00 as excess payment of the prescribed legal fees under O.R. No. 10664219 dated 31 may 1999.

Very truly yours,

TOMASITA M. DRIS

Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE