ChanRobles Virtual law Library
[ G.R. No. 138704. July 12, 1999]
GREGORIA SAUNAR VDA. DE SIDLAKAN, et al. vs. CARLOS IMPERIAL, et al.
SECOND DIVISION
Gentlemen:
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JUL 12, 1999.
G.R. No. 138704 (Gregoria Saunar Vda. de Sidlakan, et al. vs. Carlos Imperial, et al.)
In accordance with Rule 45 in relation to Rule 56 and other pertinent provisions of the 997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing appeals by certiorari to the Supreme Court, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court RESOLVES to DENY the petition for review on certiorari for:
(a) being insufficient in form due to lack of proper verification of the petition in accordance with Section 4, Rule 7 in relation to Section 1, Rule 45, as a consequence of which the petition is treated as an unsigned pleading which under Section 3, Rule 7, produces no legal effect; and
(b) failure to submit a certification, duly executed by petitioners themselves, that no other action of proceeding involving the same issues raised in this case has been filed or is pending before this Court, the Court of Appeals, or in the different divisions thereof, or any other tribunal or quasi-judicial agency, with the undertaking to inform the Court of any similar case filed or pending in any court or quasi-judicial agency that may thereafter come to their knowledge in accordance with Section 5, Rule 7, Section 4(e), Rule 45 in relation to Section 2, Rule 42 and Sections 4 and 5(d), Rule 56.
Very truly yours,
TOMASITA M. DRIS
Clerk of Court
HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE
PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
QUICK SEARCH