ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[A.M. No. 00-11-01-SC.March 25, 2003]

RE: AMENDMENT TO THE RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE OF CRIMINAL CASES

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated MAR 25 2003.

A.M. No. 00-11-01-SC(Re: Amendment to the rule on summary procedure of criminal cases to include within its coverage violations of B.P. Blg. 22, otherwise known as the Bouncing Checks Law.)

Acting on the recommendation of the Chairman of the Committee on Revision of the Rules of Court submitting for this Court's consideration and approval the Proposed Amendment To The Rule On Summary Procedure Of Criminal Cases To Include Within Its Coverage Violations Of B.P. Blg. 22, Otherwise Known As The Bouncing Checks Law, the Court Resolved to APPROVE the same.

The amendment shall take effect on April 15, 2003 following its publication in a newspaper of general circulation not later than March 30, 2003.

March 25, 2003.

Davide, Jr., C.J., Bellosillo, Puno, Vitug, Mendoza, Panganiban, Quisumbing, Ynares-Santiago, Sandoval-Gutierrez, Carpio, Austria-Martinez, Corona, Carpio-Morales, Callejo, Sr., and Azcuna, JJ., concur.

AMENDMENT TO

THE RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE

OF CRIMINAL CASES

TO INCLUDE WITHIN ITS COVERAGE

VIOLATIONS OF B.P. BLG. 22,

OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE BOUNCING CHECKS LAW

Section 1 of the Revised Rule on Summary Procedure (Resolution of the Court en Banc dated October 15, 1991), is amended as follows:

"Section 1. Scope. This rule shall govern the summary procedure in the Metropolitan Trial Courts, the Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, the Municipal Trial Courts, and the Municipal Circuit Trial Courts in the following cases falling within their jurisdiction:

A.Civil Cases:

xxx

B. Criminal Cases:

xxx

4. Violations of Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 (Bouncing Checks Law);

5. All other criminal cases where the penalty prescribed by law for the offense charged is imprisonment not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding one thousand pesos (P1,000.00), or both, irrespective of other imposable penalties, accessory or otherwise, or of the civil liability arising therefrom:Provided, however, that in offenses involving damage to property through criminal negligence, this Rule shall govern where the imposable fine does not exceed ten thousand pesos (P10,000.00).

This Rule shall not apply to a civil case where the plaintiff's cause of action is pleaded in the same complaint with another cause of action subject to the ordinary procedure; nor to a criminal case where the offense charged is necessarily related to another criminal case subject to the ordinary procedure."

Very truly yours,

(Sgd.)LUZVIMINDA D. PUNO
Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE