ChanRobles Virtual law Library

chanrobles.com - PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT RESOLUTIONS - ON-LINE

cralaw_scresolutions_separator.NHAD

[A.M. OCA IPI No. 02-1298-MTJ. February 16, 2004]

MANANSALA vs. KWONG

SECOND DIVISION

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this court dated FEB 16 2004.

A.M. OCA IPI No. 02-1298-MTJ (Ramon Manansala, et al. vs. Judge Eleanor R. Kwong, Branch 51, Judge Edwin B. Ramizo, Branch 53, and Alvin A. Buencamino, Sheriff III, Branch 53, all of the Metropolitan Trial Court of Caloocan City.)

This refers to the motion for reconsideration of the Resolution of March 12, 2003, which dismissed the administrative complaint against Judges Eleanor R. Kwong and Edwin B. Ramizo and Sheriff Alvin A. Buencamino for lack of merit.

Complainants reiterate that Judges Kwong and Ramizo as well as Sheriff Buencamino failed to observe the provisions of Republic Act No. 7279 and Executive Order no. 152 before the writs of execution and demolition were implemented against them, allegedly because they are underprivileged," "homeless" and belong to the marginalized sector of the Philippine Society." The applicability of Republic Act No. 7279 and Executive Order No. 152 to complainants is a judicial matter.This court has consistently held that the acts of a judge pertaining to his judicial functions are not subject to disciplinary power unless they are committed with fraud, dishonesty, corruption or bad faith (Frani vs. Pagayatan, 363 SCRA 707).Complainants have not demonstrated that such vices attended the issuance of the writs of execution and demolition by Judges Kwong and Ramizo.Neither have they shown any impropriety in the implementation of said writs by Sheriff Buencamino.Complainants have availed of various judicial remedies in an attempt to set aside their eviction but failed to secure any affirmative relief.As aptly observed by the Office of the Court Administrator in a Report dated December 15, 2003, an administrative complaint should not be allowed as a vehicle for the review of decisions of the trial court and/or the Court of Appeals which have long become final.The Court finds no substantial argument to warrant the reconsideration of the resolution of March 12, 2003.

WHEREFORE, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED with FINALITY for lack of merit.

SO ORDERED.

Very truly yours,

(Sgd.) LUDICHI YASAY-NUNAG
Clerk of Court


Back to Home | Back to Main

 

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

 







chanrobles.com





ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com