ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[G.R. No. 164889. January 25, 2005]

PEPITO vs. COMELEC

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JAN 25 2005 .

G.R. No. 164889 (Gregoria Dampog Pepito vs. Commission on Elections, et al.)

The Court Resolved to DENY for lack of merit the Motion Invoking the Power of the Honorable Supreme Court to Exercise Its Symbolic Function and Motion for Leave to File Second Motion for Reconsideration and/or Motion for Clarification with Prayer to Set Said Motions for Hearing and Oral Arguments, dated 22 November 2004 filed by counsel for petitioner, considering that a second motion for reconsideration is a prohibited pleading under Rule 52, Section 2 in relation to Rule 56, Section 2, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended.

The Second Motion for Reconsideration dated 22 November 2004 is NOTED WITHOUT ACTION in view of the above denial.

No further pleadings will be entertained.

Let entry of judgment be made in due course.

Callejo, Sr., J., on official leave.

Very truly yours,

LUZVIMINDA D. PUNO
Clerk of Court

By:

(Sgd.) MA. LUISA D. VILLARAMA

Assistant Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE