ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[G.R. No. 166187. January 25, 2005]

ANDUEZA vs. BRAVO

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JAN 25 2005 .

G.R. No. 166187 (Eduardo Mape "Eddie" Andueza vs. Narciso Bong Bravo and The House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal.)

In accordance with Rule 65 and other related provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing petitions for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus filed with the Supreme Court, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court Resolved to DISMISS the instant petition for certiorari for non-compliance therewith, particularly for failure to fully pay the legal fees in violation of Rule 46, Section 3 in relation to Rule 56, Section 2.

Panganiban, Ynares-Santiago and Carpio, JJ., no part.

Callejo, Sr., J., on official leave.

Very truly yours,

LUZVIMINDA D. PUNO
Clerk of Court

By:

(Sgd.) MA. LUISA D. VILLARAMA

Assistant Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE