ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[G.R. No. 166430. January 25, 2005]

DE CASTRO vs. CSC

Gentlemen:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JAN 25 2005 .

G.R. No. 166430 (Simeon J. de Castro, Jr. vs. Civil Service Commission, National Capital Region.)

In accordance with rule 65 and other related provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing petitions for certiorari, prohibition and mandamus filed with the Supreme Court, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court Resolved to DISMISS the instant petition for certiorari for non-compliance therewith, particularly for insufficient or defective verification under Rule 7, Section 4.

In any event, the petition would still be dismissed for failure of the petition to sufficiently show that any grave abuse of discretion was committed by the Civil Service Commission in rendering the challenged Decision dated 23 December 2004 which, on the contrary, appears to be in accord with the facts and applicable law and jurisprudence.

Callejo, Sr., J., on official leave.

Very truly yours,

LUZVIMINDA D. PUNO

Clerk of Court

By:

(Sgd.) MA. LUISA D. VILLARAMA

Assistant Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE