ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[

BALINDONG vs. LIMBONA

Sirs/Mesdames:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JUN 6 2005.

G.R. No. 159962 (MAYOR ANWAR BERUA BALINDONG, ET AL. v. ZENAIDA LIMBONA, ET AL.)

Before us is a COMMENT/OPPOSITION dated 05 April 2005 filed by counsel for respondent to petitioners' motion for reconsideration of our Decision of 16 December 2004, a SUPPLEMENT TO THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION dated 06 April 2005 by counsel for petitioners, a MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE COMMENT on petitioners' motion for reconsideration, and an undated REPLY filed by counsel for petitioners, without leave of court, to respondent's comment/opposition.

The Court notes that petitioners have adduced no substantial or cogent arguments to warrant a modification of our Decision. They merely rehashed the arguments in their petition, which we have already passed upon. Wherefore, the Motion for Reconsideration and its supplement thereto are DENIED with FINALITY. NO FURTHER PLEADINGS WILL BE ENTERTAINED.

In view of the denial with finality of the Motion for Reconsideration and acting on the clarificatory letter of Branch Clerk of Court Edwin Paredes of Quezon City RTC, Branch 219, which we noted in our Resolution dated 02 March 2005, there is no longer any obstacle to the implementation of the existing warrants of arrest.

Very truly yours,

(Sgd.) LUDICHI YASAY-NUNAG
Clerk of Court

Back to Home | Back to Main

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE