ChanRobles Virtual law Library

[G.R. No. 155207. August 7, 2006]

WILHELMINA S. OROZCO v. PHILIPPINE DAILY INQUIRER AND LETICIA JIMENEZ MAGSANOC

Sirs/Mesdames:

Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated AUG. 7, 2006

G.R. No. 155207 (Wilhelmina S. Orozco v. Philippine Daily Inquirer and Leticia Jimenez Magsanoc)

In the dispositive portion of the Court's Resolution dated 29 April 2005, the Court required the Labor Arbiter "to clarify the amount of the award due the petitioner," and thereafter, for the private respondents to post the requisite appeal bond in accordance with Article 223 of the Labor Code. ^[1] cralaw However, private respondents have since manifested that the Labor Arbiter has yet to make the necessary clarification pursuant to the Court's Resolution.

The petition arose from NLRC Case No. NCR-00-06-03668-93, which was decided on 29 October 1993 by Labor Arbiter Arthur L. Amansac. ^[2] cralaw However, the Resolution of the Court dated 29 April 2005 was served on the "National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC)," without reference to the Office of the Labor Arbiter, or any labor arbiter in particular. ^[3] cralaw It is not certain whether Labor Arbiter Amansac is still with the NLRC, considering that 12 years had passed since his original decision.

If only to reiterate the duty on the part of the NLRC, particularly its labor arbiters, to comply with the Resolution of the Court dated 29 April 2005, the Court RESOLVES to RESEND a copy of the aforementioned Resolution, as well as the Resolution dated 14 September 2005 to "Labor Arbiter Arthur L. Amansac, or the Labor Arbiter currently assigned to Case No. NCR-00-06-03668-93," and to require the Labor Arbiter concerned to "clarify the amount due to the petitioner" within ten (10) days from receipt of this Resolution, and for private respondents to post the requisite bond in accordance with Article 223 of the Labor Code within five (5) days from receipt of the Labor Arbiter's compliance. Thereafter, the petition will be given due course.

Very truly yours,

(Sgd.) LUDICHI YASAY-NUNAG
Clerk of Court

Endnotes:

^[1] cralaw Rollo , p. 392.

^[2] cralaw Id at 83-88.

^[3] cralaw Id. at 379.

Back to Home | Back to Main

 

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE

1901	1902	1903	1904	1905	1906	1907	1908
1909	1910	1911	1912	1913	1914	1915	1916
1917	1918	1919	1920	1921	1922	1923	1924
1925	1926	1927	1928	1929	1930	1931	1932
1933	1934	1935	1936	1937	1938	1939	1940
1941	1942	1943	1944	1945	1946	1947	1948
1949	1950	1951	1952	1953	1954	1955	1956
1957	1958	1959	1960	1961	1962	1963	1964
1965	1966	1967	1968	1969	1970	1971	1972
1973	1974	1975	1976	1977	1978	1979	1980
1981	1982	1983	1984	1985	1986	1987	1988
1989	1990	1991	1992	1993	1994	1995	1996
1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004
2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012
2013

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

QUICK SEARCH

1901	1902	1903	1904	1905	1906	1907	1908
1909	1910	1911	1912	1913	1914	1915	1916
1917	1918	1919	1920	1921	1922	1923	1924
1925	1926	1927	1928	1929	1930	1931	1932
1933	1934	1935	1936	1937	1938	1939	1940
1941	1942	1943	1944	1945	1946	1947	1948
1949	1950	1951	1952	1953	1954	1955	1956
1957	1958	1959	1960	1961	1962	1963	1964
1965	1966	1967	1968	1969	1970	1971	1972
1973	1974	1975	1976	1977	1978	1979	1980
1981	1982	1983	1984	1985	1986	1987	1988
1989	1990	1991	1992	1993	1994	1995	1996
1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004
2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011