

|
TO: ALL MEMBERS OF THE BAR SUBJECT: PRESCRIBING STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 3 AND 5 IN RELATION TO SECTION 10 OF RULE 13 OF THE RULES OF COURT ON SERVICE OF PETITION OR MOTION FOR EXTENSION. This Court has observed the practice of counsel who, in filing motions for extension or petitions, fail to comply with the requirements of Circular No. 1-88 which took effect on January 1, 1989, as revised on July 1, 1997 particularly paragraph 2 thereof [Form and Service of Petition] in conjunction with Sections 3, 5, and 10 of Rule 13 of the Rules of Court. For the guidance of all concerned, Section 10 of Rule 13 of the Rules of Court is reproduced hereunder:
The aforequoted rule
finds implementation in paragraph 2, Revised Circular No. 1-88, which
reads:
A petition filed under Rule 45, or under Rule 65, or a motion for extension, may be denied outright if it is not clearly legible, or there is no proof of service on the lower court, tribunal, or service of the lower court, tribunal, or office concerned and on the adverse party in accordance with Sections 3, 5 and 10 of Rule 13, attached to the petition or motion for extension when filed. Effective September
15, 1991, henceforth, a petition or motion for extension filed before
this
Court shall be dismissed/denied outright if there is no such proof of
service
in accordance with Sections 3 and 5 in relation to Section 10 of Rule
13
of the Rules of Court attached to the petition/motion when filed.
The form of Affidavit of Service is attached herewith as Annex "A". Strict compliance with this Circular is hereby enjoined. The Clerk of Court of this Court is directed to cause the publication on Friday, August 16, 1991 of this Circular in two [2] newspapers of general circulation August 13, 1991.
|
|
|
|
|



|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

