US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

EAST ALABAMA RY. CO. V. DOE, 114 U. S. 340 (1885)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 114 U. S. 340 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

East Alabama Ry. Co. v. Doe, 114 U.S. 340 (1885)

East Alabama Railway Company v. Doe

Argued March 20, 1885

Decided April 13, 1885

114 U.S. 340


Various owners of lands in Alabama granted to a railroad corporation of that state "and its assigns," in 1860, a right of way through the lands to make and run a railroad, the corporation having a franchise to do so and to take tolls, and it obtained a like right as to other land by statutory proceeding. It graded a part of the line. V., a judgment creditor of the corporation, in 1867 levied an execution on the right of way, and it was sold to V., and the sheriff deeded it to him, and he took possession of the roadbed. In 1870, he contracted with another railroad corporation to complete the grading of the line of road for so much per mile, and, on being paid, to transfer to it all his title to the franchise, right of way, and property of the old corporation. He completed the work and was not paid in full, but gave possession of the road, in 1871, to the corporation, and its franchises and road and property passed, in 1850, to another corporation, the defendant, against whom V. brought an action of ejectment to recover the roadbed:

Held: chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 114 U. S. 341

(1) The right of way could not be sold on execution or otherwise to a purchaser who did not own the franchise.

(2) There was nothing in the contract to estop the defendant from disputing the right of V. to recover in ejectment on the strength of his title.

(3) V. could not recover.

This was an action of ejectment. The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™