US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

JACKS V. HELENA, 115 U. S. 288 (1885)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 115 U. S. 288 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Jacks v. Helena, 115 U.S. 288 (1885)

Jacks v. Helena

Submitted November 2, 1885

Decided November 9, 1885

115 U.S. 288


When it distinctly appears on the face of an opinion of a state court, which by a law of the state forms part of the record, that the decision below was properly put upon a ground that did not involve a federal question, although such question was raised there, this Court has no jurisdiction in error over the judgment.

Detroit City Railway Co. v. Guthard, 114 U. S. 133, cited and followed.

These were suits commenced in a state court of Arkansas, praying in each case for a mandamus upon the defendants, a municipal corporation, to compel the issue and delivery of bonds of the municipality, on a subscription in aid of a railroad. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 115 U. S. 289

Judgment below that the subscription was unauthorized and void, and refusing the writ. The causes were appealed to the supreme court, where the judgment was affirmed and a written opinion entered on the record in accordance with the statute of the state providing that

"Every opinion of the supreme court shall be reduced to writing and be entered at full length on the record, and be filed among the papers in the cause to which it relates. The provisions of this section shall apply as well to motions that will dispose of a cause as to final decisions."

Ark.Stat.Revision of 1884, § 1318.

This writ of error was sued out to reverse that judgment. The defendant in error moved to dismiss the cause and the writ

"because in the decision of this cause by the Arkansas Supreme Court there was not presented and decided adversely to the claim of the plaintiff in error any federal question, the judgment in said court against the claim of the plaintiff in error being expressly based on the decision of a question other than one of a federal character."

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™