CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


HAMILTON V. VICKSBURG, S. & P. RAILROAD, 119 U. S. 280 (1886)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 119 U. S. 280 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Hamilton v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Railroad, 119 U.S. 280 (1886)

Hamilton v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad

Argued November 10, 1886

Decided December 6, 1886

119 U.S. 280

Syllabus

Whenever the exercise of a right, conferred by law for the benefit of the public, is attended with temporary inconvenience to private parties in common with the public in general, they are not entitled to damages therefor.

A railroad company was authorized by the Legislature of Louisiana to construct a railroad across that state, and as part of such road to construct necessary bridges for crossing navigable streams. The act made no provision for the form or character of such structures. A bridge across a navigable stream was constructed with a draw. In process of time, it became decayed, and defendant in error, having succeeded to the rights of the company, employed a contractor to construct a new bridge in its place, the work to be done at a time of the year when it would least obstruct navigation. The contractor complied with his contract as to the time, but owing to unusual rains, the river continued navigable, and the work was unavoidably prolonged, thereby obstructing its navigation and preventing the vessels of plaintiff in error from passing beyond the bridge. Held that this was a case of damnum absque injuria.

Escanaba Co. v. Chicago, 107 U. S. 678, and Cardwell v. American Bridge Co., 113 U. S. 205, affirmed and applied.

The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The case in the court below will be found reported in 34 La.Ann. 973. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 119 U. S. 281





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED