CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


SHARP V. RIESSNER, 119 U. S. 631 (1887)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 119 U. S. 631 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Sharp v. Riessner, 119 U.S. 631 (1887)

Sharp v. Riessner

Argued December 16, 1886

Decided January 10, 1887

119 U.S. 631

Syllabus

The first claim of letters patent No. 177,334, granted to Abner B. Hutchins, May 16th, 1876, for an improvement in hydrocarbon stoves, namely,

"1. The water vessel A, with its perforated top plate A' and hot air 'cylinder' C, hinged at c to plate A', and top perforated plate L, all arranged and connected together substantially as and for the purpose set forth,"

the perforated top plate A' being described in the specification as a plate in which arranged around a central opening is a series of perforations "through which atmospheric air passes down into the top part of the vessel A and thence up through the hot air cylinder and its chimneys," is not infringed by a stove in which, instead of the perforated top plate A', there are three equidistant struts on which the hot air cylinder rests, with an open space between every two of the struts, the struts not performing the office so described as that performed by the perforated top plate A'.

This was a bill in equity for the infringement of letters patent. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED