US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

COGSWELL V. FORDYCE, 128 U. S. 391 (1888)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 128 U. S. 391 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Cogswell v. Fordyce, 128 U.S. 391 (1888)

Cogswell v. Fordyce

No. 63

Submitted November 2, 1888

Decided November 19, 1888

128 U.S. 391


An action upon a bond given to supersede a judgment or decree of a court of the United States is not a

"case brought on account of the deprivation of any right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States, or of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States,"

so as to give this Court jurisdiction of it in error or on appeal under the fourth subdivision of Rev.Stat. § 699 "without regard to the sum or valve in dispute."

As the matter in dispute in this case, exclusive of costs, does not exceed the sum or value of $5,000, the writ of error is dismissed.

Samuel W. Fordyce recovered in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas, December 7, 1882, a judgment in ejectment against Thomas J. Cogswell and Anna M. Cogswell. From that judgment the latter prayed an appeal to this Court, executing with J. L. Good bar, as surety, a bond in the penalty of $3,600 conditioned that the principal obligors would prosecute their appeal with effect or, failing therein, pay all such costs and damages as the obligee sustained by reason of the wrongful detention of the property sued for.

The obligors having failed to prosecute their appeal, the present suit was brought February 24, 1885, upon said bond to recover the sum of $3,600 as the damages sustained by reason of the detention of the property from the plaintiff in the ejectment suit.

A demurrer to the complaint having been overruled, the defendants filed an answer. The parties consenting thereto in writing, the case was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, and judgment rendered June 20, 1885, in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $2,400.

The defendants thereupon sued out this writ of error. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 128 U. S. 392

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™