CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


POSTAL TELEGRAPH CABLE CO. V. BALTIMORE, 156 U. S. 210 (1895)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 156 U. S. 210 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Baltimore, 156 U.S. 210 (1895)

Postal Telegraph Cable Company v. Baltimore

No. 828

Submitted January 21, 1895

Decided January 28, 1895

156 U.S. 210

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND

Syllabus

St. Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 118 U. S. 92, affirmed and applied to this case.

This was an action at law, brought by the City of Baltimore, defendant in error, against The Postal Telegraph Cable Company, plaintiff in error, a corporation created under the laws of the New York, in the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City, a court of original common law jurisdiction, to recover the sum of $1,018.00, with interest from the 15th day of June, 1893, the same being an annual rental fee for the use of the streets of Baltimore, of $2.00 per pole, for 509 telegraph poles, which were owned by the plaintiff in error, and located in and occupying a portion of the public streets of Baltimore. The rental fee was the amount prescribed by Ordinance No. 86 of 1893, to be paid by all companies which chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 156 U. S. 211

owned and had located in the streets of Baltimore similar poles and similarly used. Judgment below in plaintiff's favor, which judgment was sustained by the Court of Appeals of the Maryland. A writ of error being sued out to the latter judgment, the defendant in error moved to dismiss or affirm it on the ground, among others, that

"the ordinance in question was based on and passed after the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States was delivered in St. Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 148 U. S. 92, and 149 U. S. 149 U.S. 465, and upon the strength of that case, the defendant in error relied in the Court of Appeals of Maryland, and now relies in this Court."

THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of St. Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 148 U. S. 92.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED