US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

LOUISIANA V. NEW ORLEANS, 167 U. S. 407 (1897)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 167 U. S. 407 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Louisiana v. New Orleans, 167 U.S. 407 (1897)

Louisiana v. New Orleans

No. 483

Argued January 15, 18, 1897

Decided May 24, 1897

167 U.S. 407




New Orleans v. Citizens' Bank, 167 U.S. 871, affirmed and followed.

The case is stated in the opinion. The case was argued with New Orleans v. Citizens' Bank, ante, 167 U. S. 371, as one case. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 167 U. S. 408

MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

The reasons given for our decree in the case of New Orleans v. Citizens' Bank, just decided, are decisive of this cause, which comes on error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. The controversy presented to that court was whether property bought in by the Citizens' Bank under foreclosure of its stock and stock loan mortgages became a part of its capital, and as such was not liable to taxation. The Supreme Court of Louisiana held, conceding arguendo the nontaxability of the capital, that the real estate so purchased was taxable. State ex Rel. Citizens' Bank v. Board of Assessors, 48 La.Ann. 35.

The theory on which the writ of error was prosecuted is that this decision of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana constitutes an impairment of the obligations of the contract arising from the charter of the bank.

As, in the case just decided, we have held that the property bought in by the bank under foreclosure of its stock mortgages was not the capital of the bank, and therefore was not covered by the estoppel of the thing adjudged, the conclusions there expressed are in all respects applicable and decisive of the controversy here presented, and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Louisiana is therefore


ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™