CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


UTTER V. FRANKLIN, 172 U. S. 416 (1899)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 172 U. S. 416 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Utter v. Franklin, 172 U.S. 416 (1899)

Utter v. Franklin

No. 94

Argued and submitted December 12, 1898

Decided January 3, 1899

172 U.S. 416

Syllabus

It was within the power of Congress to validate the bonds in question in this proceeding, issued by the authorities of the Territory of Arizona, to promote the construction of a railroad.

This was a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendants, who were, respectively, governor, auditor, and secretary of the territory, acting as loan commissioners, to issue certain bonds in exchange for bonds issued by the County of Pima in aid of the Arizona Narrow-Gauge Railroad Company.

The petition set forth that plaintiffs were the bona fide holders for value of certain seven percent bonds and coupons issued in July, 1883, in compliance with an act of the territory "to promote the construction of a certain railroad," approved February 21, 1883, aggregating, including principal and interest thereon, the sum of $289,964.50. There was a further allegation in the petition that it was the duty of the defendants to provide for the redeeming of such indebtedness, and to issue refunding bonds therefor; that plaintiffs had made demands for the same, which defendants had refused.

Defendants demurred to the petition, and for answer thereto averred that the bonds now held by the plaintiffs chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 172 U. S. 417

had been declared, both by the supreme court of the territory and by this Court, to be void, and therefore the petition of the relators should be dismissed.

The petition being denied by the Supreme Court of Arizona, the relators appealed to this Court. No opinion was filed in the supreme court of the territory.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED