CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


UNITED STATES V. PENA, 175 U. S. 500 (1899)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 175 U. S. 500 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Pena, 175 U.S. 500 (1899)

United States v. Pena

No. 72

Submitted October 27, 1899

Decided December 18, 1899

175 U.S. 500

Syllabus

The appeal in this case having been allowed within six months after the receipt by the Attorney General of the statement of the case by the trial attorney, and the action of the trial attorney having been approved by one of the justices of the trial court, there is no sufficient reason for the motion to dismiss, this Court having the power under its rules to notice plain errors, even when not assigned.

An appeal from the Court of Private Land Claims can be allowed by one of the Associate Justices of the court.

The grant of lands, in this case, set forth at length in the opinion of the court, was a grant in severalty, and not one of a single large tract to chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 175 U. S. 501

several persons, to be by them held in common or distributed among each other.

This grant, having been made after the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, it was not within the power of the alcalde to change it by directing grants to additional persons not included in the original grant, and the whole proceeding may be ignored except so far as it indicates those who took title under the original grant or discloses those who were their successors in interest.

The statement of the case is in the opinion of the Court.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED