CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


ICC V. CHICAGO, B. & Q. R. CO., 186 U. S. 320 (1902)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 186 U. S. 320 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

ICC v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 186 U.S. 320 (1902)

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago,

Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company

No. 164

Argued November 7-8, 1901

Decided June 2, 1902

186 U.S. 320

Syllabus

This record requires the court to determine whether the court below rightly refused to enforce an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission by which it was found that an alleged terminal charge, made by the defendants in error, for the delivery of livestock to the stockyards in Chicago, was unjust and unreasonable, and hence a violation of the Act to Regulate Commerce.

As the right of the defendant carriers to divide their rates was conceded by the Commission, and upheld, no contention on this subject arises.

The through rate existing prior to June 1, 1894, is presumed to have provided compensation for services in making delivery at the stockyards.

The proposed conclusion that the rates were unjust and unreasonable cannot be sustained.

The decree of the circuit court of appeals was right, and must be affirmed, but nothing therein is to be construed as preventing that body from commencing proceedings to correct unreasonableness in the rates as to territory to which the reduction did not apply.

The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED