US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

AMERICAN STEEL & WIRE CO. V. SPEED, 192 U. S. 500 (1904)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 192 U. S. 500 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed, 192 U.S. 500 (1904)

American Steel & Wire Company v. Speed

No. 3566

Submitted January 11, 1904

Decided February 23, 1904

192 U.S. 500


In a constitutional sense, "imports" embrace only goods brought from a foreign country, and do not include merchandise shipped from one state to another. The several states are not, therefore, controlled as to such merchandise by constitutional prohibitions against the taxation of imports, and goods brought from another state, and not from a foreign country, are subject to state taxation after reaching their destination and whilst held in the state for sale.

Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123, Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622, have never been overruled directly or indirectly by Leisy v. Hardin, 135 U. S. 100; Lyng v. Michigan, 135 U. S. 161, or other cases resting on the rule expounded in those cases.

Goods brought in original packages from another state, after they have arrived at their destination and are at rest within the state, and are enjoying the protection which the laws of the state afford, may, without violating the commerce clause of the Constitution, be taxed without discrimination like other property within the state, although at the time they are stored at a distributing point from which they are subsequently chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 192 U. S. 501

to be delivered in the same packages, through the storage company to purchasers in various states.

Where the levy of a merchant's privilege tax violates no federal right, the mere determination of who are merchants within the state law involves no federal question. The construction of the state law is conclusive, and

if it embraces all persons doing a like business there is no discrimination.

The facts are stated in the opinion of court. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 192 U. S. 508

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™