US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

CHAMBERS V. BALTIMORE & OHIO R. CO., 207 U. S. 142 (1907)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 207 U. S. 142 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 207 U.S. 142 (1907)

Chambers v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company

No. 22

Argued October 17, 18, 1907

Decided November 18, 1907

207 U.S. 142


This Court has jurisdiction to review the judgment on writ of error under § 709, Rev.Stat., if the opinion of the highest court of the state clearly shows that the federal question was assumed to be in issue, was decided adversely, and the decision was essential to the judgment rendered.

The right to sue and defend in the courts of the states is one of the privileges and immunities comprehended by § 2 of Art. IV of the Constitution of the United States, and equality of treatment in regard thereto does not depend upon comity between the states, but is granted and protected by that provision in the Constitution, subject, however, to the restrictions of that instrument that the limitations imposed by a state must operate in the same way on its own citizens and on those of other states. The state's own policy may determine the jurisdiction of its courts and the character of the controversies which shall be heard therein.

The statute of Ohio of 1902 providing that no action can be maintained in the courts of that state for wrongful death occurring in another state except where the deceased was a citizen of Ohio, the restriction operating equally upon representatives of the deceased whether they are citizens of Ohio or of other states, does not violate the privilege and immunity provision of the federal Constitution.

73 Ohio St. 1 affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 207 U. S. 146

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™