US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for


Subscribe to Cases that cite 218 U. S. 369 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Wetmore v. Tennessee Copper Co., 218 U.S. 369 (1910)

Wetmore v. Tennessee Copper Company

No. 500

Motion to dismiss appeal

Submitted October 11, 1910

Decided November 28, 1910

218 U.S. 369


Ladew v. Tennessee Copper Company, ante, p. 218 U. S. 357, followed to effect that the Circuit Court of the United States did not have jurisdiction of this case.

The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court, are stated in the opinion. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 218 U. S. 370

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff, George Peabody Wetmore, a citizen of Rhode Island, is the owner in fee and in possession of large tracts of land, valuable for timber, farming, and residence purposes, in Polk County, Eastern District of Tennessee. The defendants are the same corporations as those mentioned in Ladew v. Tennessee Copper Co., just decided ante, p. 218 U. S. 357.

The plaintiff, after setting out substantially the same facts as those stated in the Ladew case in reference to the conduct by each defendant of its business, and to the injury done to his lands by the mode in which that business is conducted, seeks the same relief as to his lands in Tennessee as that asked by the plaintiffs in the other case as to their lands in Georgia. Each defendant appeared specially -- the defendant the Tennessee corporation, for the purpose of objecting to the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of the United States, sitting in Tennessee, to give the relief asked by the bill against it, and the British corporation for the purpose of moving to dismiss the bill because of misjoinder of parties, and because of want of jurisdiction in that court to sustain an action against it in Tennessee for the wrong alleged to have been done to the present plaintiffs.

The circuit court dismissed the bill as to the Tennessee Copper Company, but overruled the motion to dismiss the bill as to the British corporation, the court being of the opinion that it had jurisdiction of the latter corporation. From that decree, so far as it related to the Tennessee Copper Company, Wetmore appealed to this Court. In conformity with § 5 of the Act of Congress of March 3d 1891, c. 517, 26 Stat. 827, the question of chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 218 U. S. 371

jurisdiction was certified by the circuit court to this Court.

On the authority of Ladew v. Tennessee Copper Co., the decree of the court below must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™