US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

SPOKANE &C. RY. CO. V. WASH. & GT. NOR. RY. CO., 219 U. S. 166 (1911)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 219 U. S. 166 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Spokane &c. Ry. Co. v. Wash. & Gt. Nor. Ry. Co., 219 U.S. 166 (1911)

Spokane and British Columbia Railway Company

v. Washington and Great Northern Railway Company

No. 49

Submitted November 29, 1910

Decided January 3, 1911

219 U.S. 166


No one can take advantage of the forfeiture provided for nonperformance of a condition subsequent in a land grant in praesenti except the government, Schulenberg v. Harriman, 21 Wall. 44, nor can there be any forfeiture on the part of the United States without appropriate judicial proceeding equivalent to office found or legislative assertion of ownership.

Although the grant of a right of way involved in this action made by the Act of June 4, 1898, c. 377, 30 Stat. 430, provided for grading and completion of a specified number of miles of track, failure to do so did not operate as a forfeiture without action by the government or render the grant null or void leaving the land open for settlement or location by another railroad.

Whether a granted right of way to a railroad under act of Congress has been abandoned by the grantee or whether the grantee is estopped to make claim thereunder are not federal questions, and the decision of the state court is not reviewable here.

49 Wash. 280 affirmed.

The facts, which involve the right of a grantee of lands under the Act of June 4, 1898, 30 Stat. 430, are stated in the opinion. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 219 U. S. 169

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™