US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

MISSOURI & KANSAS INT. RY. CO. V. OLATHE, 222 U. S. 185 (1911)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 222 U. S. 185 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Missouri & Kansas Int. Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U.S. 185 (1911)

Missouri & Kansas Interurban Railway Company v. Olathe

No. 726

Motion to dismiss

Submitted November 13, 1911

Decided December 4, 1911

222 U.S. 185




Unless it appears from the record that the judgment sought to be reviewed finally determines the cause, this Court is without jurisdiction.

Where the judgment sought to be reviewed affirms the judgment below but merely sustains the demurrer without dismissing the suit, so that the cause is left standing in the lower court for further proceedings, it is not a final judgment reviewable by this Court.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Memorandum opinion by direction of the Court. By MR. JUSTICE HUGHES:

Motion to dismiss. This suit was brought by the railway company, plaintiff in error, against the City of Olathe, Kansas, in the District Court of Johnson County chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 222 U. S. 186

in that state, to recover damages caused by the repeal of an ordinance authorizing the use of certain streets of the city for an interurban railway, and by the consequent prevention, until the passage of a new ordinance, of its construction and operation. The defendant demurred to the petition upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The district court sustained the demurrer, and its decision was affirmed by the supreme court of the state. And this writ of error is brought.

The record fails to disclose a final judgment. The supreme court affirmed the judgment of the lower court, but this merely sustained the demurrer without dismissing the suit. The supreme court did not direct its dismissal, but the cause was left standing in the court below for such proceedings as might be had according to law after the decision on the demurrer, either by amendment of the petition or entry of final judgment.

As it does not appear from the record that the judgment sought to be reviewed was one which finally determined the cause, this Court is without jurisdiction. Miners' Bank of Dubuque v. United States, 5 How. 213; McComb v. Knox County, 91 U. S. 1; Great Western Telegraph Company v. Burnham, 162 U. S. 339; Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, 183 U. S. 130.


ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™