US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

BROWN V. ELLIOTT, 225 U. S. 392 (1912)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 225 U. S. 392 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Brown v. Elliott, 225 U.S. 392 (1912)

Brown v. Elliott

Nos. 201, 202

Argued October 19, 1911

Reargued May 1, 1912

Decided June 10, 1912

225 U.S. 392


If the indictment under § 5440, Rev.Stat., sufficiently charges the commission of overt acts within the district, it is sufficient even if it states that the place where the conspiracy formed is unknown.

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution does not preclude the place of trial of conspirators indicted under § 5440, Rev.Stat., being in any state where an overt act was performed. Hyde v. United States, ante, p. 225 U. S. 347.

A conspiracy entered into in violation of § 5440, Rev.Stat., may be a continuous crime, and, if it was designed to be, and was, continuous, every overt act was the act of all the conspirators by reason of the terms of their unlawful plot.

Where there are successive overt acts during the existence of the conspiracy, the period of limitation must be computed from the date of the last of them properly specified in the indictment, although some of them may have occurred more than three years before the indictment was found.

The Constitution of the United States is not intended as a facility for crime, but to prevent oppression; its letter and its spirit are satisfied if, where a criminal purpose is executed, that criminal purpose be punished. The criminal himself makes the venue of his trial.

The facts, which involve the validity of an indictment under § 5440 Rev.Stat., are stated in the opinion. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 225 U. S. 393

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™