CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. V. DUNLEVY, 241 U. S. 518 (1916)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 241 U. S. 518 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

New York Life Ins. Co. v. Dunlevy, 241 U.S. 518 (1916)

New York Life Insurance Company v. Dunlevy

No. 290

Argued May 14, 15, 1916

Decided June 5, 1916

241 U.S. 518

Syllabus

A party to an action does not, after final judgment, still remain in court and subject, without further personal service, to whatsoever orders may be entered under the title of that cause.

Interpleader proceedings brought by a garnishee are not essential concomitants of the original action in which the judgment was rendered on which the garnishment is based, but are collateral, and require personal service on the judgment debtor.

In Pennsylvania, a judgment debtor is not a party to a garnishment proceeding to condemn a claim due him from a third person, nor is he bound by a judgment discharging the garnishee.

Any personal judgment which a state court may render against one not voluntarily submitting to its jurisdiction, and who is not a citizen of the state nor served with process within its border, no matter what the mode of service, is void because the court has no jurisdiction over his person.

214 F. 1 affirmed.

The facts, which involve the effect of a garnishee proceeding in one state and pleaded in an action in another state, are stated in the opinion. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 241 U. S. 519





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED