US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

PETERSEN V. IOWA, 245 U. S. 170 (1917)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 245 U. S. 170 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Petersen v. Iowa, 245 U.S. 170 (1917)

Petersen v. Iowa

No. 74

Argued November 21, 1917

Decided December lo, 1917

245 U.S. 170


Article 7 of the treaty with Denmark of April 26, 1826, 8 Stat. 340, (renewed April 11, 1857, 11 Stat. 719) places no limitation upon the right of either government to deal with its own citizens and their property within its dominion.

Therefore, where a native of Denmark, who became a naturalized citizen of the United States, died a resident and property owner in the Iowa, and in the settlement there of his estate, inheritance taxes were imposed in respect of legacies to subjects and residents of Denmark, the treaty affords the legatees no basis for complaining of the discrimination of the Iowa law (1907 Supp.Code, chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 245 U. S. 171

§ 1467), which taxes legacies to nonresident aliens higher than those given under similar conditions to residents of the state without regard to the residence or nationality of the testator.

The favored nation clause in Article 1 of the above cited treaty with Denmark is applicable only "in respect of commerce and navigation;" it does not apply where the discrimination complained of is in the rates of state inheritance taxes.

166 Ia. 617 affirmed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™