US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
SMITH V. JACKSON, 246 U. S. 388 (1918)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 246 U. S. 388U.S. Supreme Court
Smith v. Jackson, 246 U.S. 388 (1918)
Smith v. Jackson
No. 57
Argued March 6, 7, 1918
Decided April 15, 1918
246 U.S. 388
Syllabus
The Auditor for the Canal Zone has no authority to make deductions for rent of quarters, and because of absence, from the salary of the district judge of the Zone, as fixed and appropriated for by Congress.
Intimated that, but for the character of the proceeding (mandamus) and doubt as to intent, damages would have been inflicted on the Auditor under Rule 23, for plain abuse of administrative discretion in prosecuting this writ of error after being advised by an opinion of the Attorney General and two decisions of the courts below of his manifest duty under the statute respecting the payment of the judge's salary.
241 F.7d 7 affirmed. chanrobles.com-red
The case is stated in the opinion.
