US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

KANSAS V. BURLESON, 250 U. S. 188 (1919)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 250 U. S. 188 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Kansas v. Burleson, 250 U.S. 188 (1919)

Kansas v. Burleson

No. 31, Original

Argued May 5, 6, 1919

Decided June 2, 1919

250 U.S. 188




Decided on the authority of Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. South Dakota, ante, 250 U. S. 163.

Bill dismissed.

The case is stated in the opinion. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 250 U. S. 190

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

The State of Kansas, invoking the original jurisdiction of this Court, filed its bill to enjoin the Postmaster General from enforcing and the defendant corporation from giving effect to a schedule of telephone rates which the Postmaster General had established and which he had directed should be applied for telephone services rendered on lines which were in the control and possession of the United States and were being operated as governmental agencies in virtue of the resolution of Congress and the proclamation of the President referred to and considered in the Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. South Dakota, ante, 250 U. S. 163.

The defendants, insisting that the suit was not in substance against an officer to restrain the doing of unauthorized acts, but was really one to prevent an official of the United States from discharging his duty under a law of the United States, both disputed the merits and challenged the jurisdiction. The case was heard coincidentally with the Dakota Central Telephone case, this day decided. As the ruling in that case establishes the want of foundation for the contention made in this as to the illegality of the acts of the officer complained of, it follows also that what was stated in that case as to the form of our decree is likewise here controlling, and for the reasons there stated in this as in that case, our decree must be and is one of dismissal of the bill.

And it is so ordered.


ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™