US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

BALL ENGINEERING CO. V. J. G. WHITE & CO., 250 U. S. 46 (1919)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 250 U. S. 46 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Ball Engineering Co. v. J. G. White & Co., 250 U.S. 46 (1919)

Ball Engineering Company v. J. G. White & Company

No. 227

Argued March 13, 1919

Decided May 19, 1919

250 U.S. 46


A provision in a construction contract that, in case of annulment,

"the United States all have the right to take possession of, wherever they may be, and to retain all materials, tools, buildings, tramways, cars, etc., or any part or parts of same prepared for use or in use in the prosecution of the work, . . . under purchase at a valuation to be determined by the Engineer Officer in charge"

held not applicable, in invitum, to property belonging to, and which had been used in the construction by, a third party. P. 250 U. S. 54.

Upon annulment of a construction contract, the government retained certain property on the site which belonged to a third party who had been doing the work, and, with knowledge of his claim and without his consent, valued it, credited the defaulting contractor accordingly, and leased or disposed of it to a new contractor at the latter's request for the completion of the work upon the understanding that the United States did not undertake to transfer title, nor guarantee peaceable possession, etc., and would not be responsible for the expense or cost of any action against the new contractor, nor subject itself to any claim on account of the seizure. Held that no contractual liability could be implied against the United chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 250 U. S. 47

States, and that the new contractor, having so taken and used the property, was liable to its owner for the conversion. Id. United States v. Buffalo Pitts Co., 234 U. S. 228, distinguished.

241 F.9d 9 reversed.

The case is stated in the opinion. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 250 U. S. 50

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™