US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

DE REES V. COSTAGUTA, 254 U. S. 166 (1920)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 254 U. S. 166 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

De Rees v. Costaguta, 254 U.S. 166 (1920)

De Rees v. Costaguta

No. 341

Submitted October 11, 1920

Decided December 6, 1920

254 U.S. 166


A jurisdictional appeal, directly to this Court from the district court under § 238 of the Judicial Code, will not lie where the question of jurisdiction presented and decided involved only principles common to courts in general, and not the jurisdiction of the district court as a federal court. P. 254 U. S. 173.

Whether the allegations of a bill are adequate to justify the relief sought is not a question of jurisdiction. Id.

Where the jurisdiction of the district court is invoked against nonresident defendants under Jud.Code § 57 to enforce a lien on property within the district claimed to result from a contract between them and the plaintiff, a decision quashing service by publication, followed by a judgment dismissing the bill upon the ground that chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 254 U. S. 167

the contract alleged create no lien upon or right in rem in such property, does not involve the jurisdiction of the court a a federal court. Id. Chase v. Wetzlar, 225 U. S. 79, distinguished.

Questions arising under the Constitution are not presented in this case. P. 254 U. S. 174.

Appeal dismissed.

The case is stated in the opinion. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 254 U. S. 169

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™