CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


UNITED STATES V. HIGHSMITH, 255 U. S. 170 (1921)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 255 U. S. 170 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Highsmith, 255 U.S. 170 (1921)

United States v. Highsmith

No. 148

Argued January 17, 18, 1921

Decided February 28, 1921

255 U.S. 170

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Syllabus

Decided on the authority of United States v. Rogers, ante, 255 U. S. 163.

257 F.4d 1 affirmed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is like United States v. Rogers, No. 147, ante, 255 U. S. 163, and was argued and submitted at the same time.

In this instance, the government and the landowner appealed from the award of the commissioners, and the case was tried to a jury. Jurors were instructed that the allowance of interest was a matter of law, and, in a form chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 255 U. S. 171

of verdict given to them, interest at 6 percent was to be added from April 19, 1912, the date of appropriation.

It appears that, by agreement, a separate order requiring the deposit of interest was entered in order to allow a writ of error upon that point, and in connection with the above form of verdict the jurors were instructed to assess compensation as of the value of the land on April 19, 1912, and not to add interest from that time to the date of the verdict. Afterwards, a final judgment was entered in the district court requiring a deposit of the amount of the verdict, and a separate order was made directing payment of interest from April 19, 1912. A writ of error was prosecuted from the circuit court of appeals, where the judgment of the district court was affirmed. 257 F.4d 1.

The circuit court of appeals recited the facts of the case, and held that it was ruled by United States v. Rogers, ante, 255 U. S. 163. We agree with this conclusion, and the judgment of the circuit court of appeals is

Affirmed.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED