CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


PENNSYLVANIA V. WEST VIRGINIA, 263 U. S. 350 (1923)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 263 U. S. 350 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Pennsylvania v. West Virginia, 263 U.S. 350 (1923)

Pennsylvania v. West Virginia

Nos. 15 and 16, Orig., October Term, 1922

Reargued November 20, 1923

Decided December 3, 1923

263 U.S. 350

ON REHEARING

Decree heretofore made in these cases reaffirmed after rehearing.

MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER announced the ruling of the Court.

An opinion expressing the views of the Court in these cases was announced at the last term, and a decree was entered then. 262 U. S. 262 U.S. 553, 623. By the Court's leave, given at that term, a petition for rehearing was filed. The cases had been presented in oral argument three times, but three members of the Court had heard only the last presentation. This, with the importance of the questions involved and the public character of the litigants, led the Court to grant the rehearing. It was had two weeks ago. The cases have been considered again in the light of that presentation, and after this further reflection, the Court perceives no ground for disturbing the chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 263 U. S. 351

opinion heretofore announced or the decree entered thereon.

Decree reaffirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE did not participate in the consideration of the cases on the rehearing.

MR. JUSTICE HOLMES, MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS, and MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS dissent, for the reasons given in their dissenting opinions at the last term.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED