US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

ST. LOUIS, K. & S.E. R. CO. V. UNITED STATES, 267 U. S. 346 (1925)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 267 U. S. 346 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

St. Louis, K. & S.E. R. Co. v. United States, 267 U.S. 346 (1925)

St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad Co. v. United States

No. 229

Argued January 23, 1925

Decided March 2, 1925

267 U.S. 346


1. A railroad company in a contract with the Director General of Railroads expressly accepted the covenants and obligations of the latter and the rights arising thereunder

"in full adjustment, settlement, satisfaction, and discharge of any and all claims and rights

Page 267 U. S. 347

at law or in equity, which it now has or hereafter can have against the United States, the President, the Director General or any agent or agency thereof by virtue of anything done or omitted, pursuant to the acts of Congress herein referred to,"

viz., the Federal Control Act, the Act of Aug. 29, 1916, c. 418, 39 Stat. 645, and the Joint Resolutions of April 6 and December 7, 1917, 40 Stat. 1, 429. Held, that a claim of the railroad under § 3 of the Federal Control Act for a deficit in operating income, etc., previously incurred under federal control, was settled and released by the contract, and that allegations in the company's petition denying this effect and intention were mere conclusions of law, not admitted by demurrer. P. 267 U. S. 348.

2. Ordinarily, the defense of release, or accord and satisfaction, must be pleaded in bar, but where the fact appears either in the body of the petition or from an exhibit annexed, the defense may be availed of on demurrer. P. 267 U. S. 350.

3. The agreement was within the authority of the Director General. Id.

58 Ct.Clms. 339 affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing the petition on demurrer.

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™