US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

MCDONALD V. UNITED STATES, 279 U. S. 12 (1929)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 279 U. S. 12 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

McDonald v. United States, 279 U.S. 12 (1929)

McDonald v. United States

No. 117

Argued January 10, 1929

Decided February 18, 1929

279 U.S. 12


1. Service on a vessel of foreign registry cannot be considered residence in the United States for naturalization purposes. P. 279 U. S. 19.

2. A proviso is not always limited in its effect to the part of the enactment with which it is immediately associated; it may apply generally to all cases within the meaning of the language used. P 279 U. S. 20. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 279 U. S. 13

3. For the proper construction of a proviso, consideration need not be limited to the subdivision in which it is found; the General purpose of the section may be taken into account. P. 279 U. S. 22.

4. In paragraph Seven, added to the Naturalization Law by the Act of May 9, 1918, the proviso declaring

"That service by aliens upon vessels other than of American registry . . . shall not be considered a residence for naturalization purpose within the jurisdiction of the United States, and such aliens cannot secure residence for naturalization purposes during service upon vessel of foreign registry,"

does not relate to the special classes of persons made eligible to naturalization by the preceding parts of the same paragraph, but (like other provision in the paragraph) states a rule of general application. P. 279 U. S. 22.

22 F.2d 747 affirmed.

Certiorari, 277 U.S. 581, to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which affirmed a judgment of the district court denying a petition for naturalization. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 279 U. S. 18

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™