CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


LEONARD V. UNITED STATES, 279 U. S. 40 (1929)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 279 U. S. 40 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Leonard v. United States, 279 U.S. 40 (1929)

Leonard v. United States

No. 183

Argued January 17, 1929

Decided February 18, 1929

279 U.S. 40

Syllabus

1. In the Act of June 10, 1922, which adjusts the base pay of officers of the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps according to rank and length of service, the clause in § 1 providing that,

"For officers in the service on June 30, 1922, there shall be included in the computation all service which is now counted in computing longevity pay,"

refers only to officers who were in active service on that date. P. 279 U. S. 44.

2. The Act to equalize pay of retired officers, approved May 8, 1926, in providing that the pay of officers retired on or before June 30, 1922, shall not be less than that of officers of equal rank and length of service retired subsequent to that date, contemplates that the standard of comparison in each case shall be an officer continually in active service until his retirement after that date, and does not operate to extend to officers retired before June 10, 1922, the benefits of the clause from the Act of that date quoted supra, par. 1. P. 279 U. S. 45

3. An officer of the Marine Corps who retired in 1911, and, under the Act of March 2, 1903, received longevity pay for his retired service because the retirement was on account of wounds received in battle, held not entitled, under the Acts of June 10, 1922, and May 8, 1926, to have the years spent by him on the retired list counted in determining his base pay period. P. 279 U. S. 45.

64 Ct.Cls. 384 affirmed.

Certiorari, 278 U.S. 586, to a judgment rejecting a claim for additional pay, preferred by a retired officer of the Marine Corps. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 279 U. S. 41





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED