US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

CARR V. ZAJA, 283 U. S. 52 (1931)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 283 U. S. 52 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Carr v. Zaja, 283 U.S. 52 (1931)

Carr v. Zaja

No. 125

Argued March 2, 1931

Decided March 23, 1931

283 U.S. 52




1. Alien held liable to deportation, on the authority of Philippides v. Day, ante, p. 283 U. S. 48.

2. Jurisdiction of this Court to review a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeal is not defeated by the fact that the mandate of that court was issued and spread upon the record of the district court.

37 F.2d 1016 reversed.

Certiorari, 282 U.S. 816, to review a judgment sustaining an order discharging Zaja on habeas corpus.

MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case raises the same question as No. 92, ante, p. 283 U. S. 48, but, as stated in No. 92, was decided the other way by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Zaja is a Dalmatian, citizen of Jugo-Slavia. He shipped as a seaman upon an Italian ship and on its arrival at San Pedro, California, deserted the ship on January 25, 1925. He was arrested on October 4, 1928, more than three years after his entry, and after a hearing was ordered to be deported on the same ground as in No. 92. He obtained a chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 283 U. S. 53

writ of habeas corpus, and was ordered to be discharged from custody. 37 F.2d 1016. The judgment must be reversed for the reasons given in No. 92. It is objected that the mandate of the circuit court of appeals was not stayed, but was issued to the district court and spread upon its records, and that therefore the case is finished. But that does not defeat the jurisdiction of this Court. The Conqueror, 166 U. S. 110, 166 U. S. 113; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Behlmore, 169 U. S. 644, 169 U. S. 648. Rule 45.

Judgment reversed.

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™