CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


PACKER CORPORATION OF UTAH, 285 U. S. 105 (1932)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 285 U. S. 105 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Packer Corporation of Utah, 285 U.S. 105 (1932)

Packer Corporation of Utah

No. 357

Argued January 20, 1932

Decided February 23, 1932

285 U.S. 105

Syllabus

A statute of Utah forbids the advertising of cigarettes and other tobacco products on billboards, street car signs, and placards, but does not apply to advertising in newspapers and periodicals, this exemption having been introduced to avoid conflict with the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution as construed by the state's highest court. A billboard company was convicted for displaying a poster advertising a brand of cigarettes. Both poster and cigarettes were manufactured outside of the state and shipped into it by a foreign corporation, and the advertising was done under contract with an agency in another state. It was conceded that the regulation of the local sale and advertising of tobacco products was within the police power of the state.

Held:

1. The amendment exempting advertising in newspapers and periodicals to avoid conflict with the commerce clause, did not produce a discrimination violative of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. P. 285 U. S. 108.

2. It is a reasonable ground of classification that the state has power to legislate with respect to persons in certain situations, and not with respect to those in a different one. P. 285 U. S. 110.

3. The discrimination between billboard and newspaper advertising was not an arbitrary classification. The legislature may recognize degrees of evil, and adapt its legislation accordingly. Id. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 285 U. S. 106

4. In making it illegal to carry out the contract under which the advertising was being done, the statute does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, since the subject of the legislation was within the police power of the state. P. 285 U. S. 111.

5. In preventing the display, for intrastate advertising, of posters shipped in from another state, the statute does not impose an unreasonable restraint upon interstate commerce. Id.

78 Utah 177, 2 P.2d 114, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment affirming a conviction for displaying a billboard poster advertising cigarettes. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 285 U. S. 107





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED