CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


QUERCIA V. UNITED STATES, 289 U. S. 466 (1933)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 289 U. S. 466 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Quercia v. United States, 289 U.S. 466 (1933)

Quercia v. United States

No. 701

Argued May 9, 1933

Decided May 29, 1933

289 U.S. 466

Syllabus

1. The right of a trial judge in a federal court to comment upon the evidence and express his opinion of it, while making clear to the jury that they are not bound by his opinion and that all matters of fact are submitted to their determination, is an essential common law prerogative maintained by the Constitution. P. 289 U. S. 469.

2. This privilege, however, does not permit the judge to distort or add to the evidence, and, because of his great influence on the jury, he must use great care to be fair and not mislead, and must studiously avoid deductions and theories not warranted by evidence. P. 289 U. S. 470.

3. It is important that hostile comment of the judge in a criminal case should not render vain the privilege of the accused to testify in his own behalf. P. 289 U. S. 470.

4. The court charged the jury:

"And now I am going to tell you what I think of the defendant's testimony. You may have noticed, Mr. Foreman and gentlemen, that he wiped his hands during his testimony. It is a rather curious thing, but that is almost always an indication of lying. Why it should be so, we don't know, but that is the fact. I think that every single word that man said, except when he agreed with the Government's testimony, was a lie. "

Page 289 U. S. 467

Held error, and not cured by a warning that the judge's opinion of the evidence was not binding on the jury and that, if they did not agree with it, they should find the defendant not guilty.

62 F.2d 746 reversed.

Certiorari to review the affirmance of a sentence under the Federal Narcotics Act. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 289 U. S. 468





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED