CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


LIFE & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. V. MCCRAY, 291 U. S. 566 (1934)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 291 U. S. 566 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Life & Casualty Insurance Co. v. McCray, 291 U.S. 566 (1934)

Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tennessee v. McCray

No. 89

Argued February 5, 1934

Decided March 5, 1934

291 U.S. 566

Syllabus

1. A state statute by which a life insurance company, if it fail to pay upon demand the amount due under a policy after death of the insured, is made liable in addition for fixed damages, reasonable chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 291 U. S. 567

in amount, and for a reasonable attorney's fee for collection, to be taxed by the court, is consistent with the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment even though payment of the policy was resisted in good faith and upon reasonable grounds. Pp. 291 U. S. 569-570.

So held where the statute was in effect when the policy was issued.

2. The nature of the insurance business and the peculiar hardships commonly experienced by the beneficiary when payment does not follow promptly the death of the insured justify these special requirements. Pp. 291 U. S. 569-570.

3. Damages of twelve percent of the face of the policy (the amount fixed by the Arkansas statute here under consideration) cannot be adjudged unreasonable and oppressive in view of the contrary finding implied in the statute itself and of like measures in other states long acquiesced in. P. 291 U. S. 570.

4. The presumption of validity which applies to legislation generally, is fortified by continued acquiescence. P. 291 U. S. 572.

5. A statutory penalty for refusal to pay an obligation when due may be unconstitutional if so extravagant in amount as to deter the honest debtor from making a bona fide defense in court, and yet may be valid if the amount be gauged reasonably as a stimulus to prompt settlement and as compensation to the creditor in case of delay. P. 291 U. S. 572.

187 Ark. 49; 58 S.W.2d 199, affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment, affirming a recovery in an action on a policy of life insurance. Twelve percent damages and attorneys' fees were included in the judgment.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED