CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


HERNDON V. GEORGIA, 295 U. S. 441 (1935)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 295 U. S. 441 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U.S. 441 (1935)

Herndon v. Georgia

No. 665

Argued April 12, 1935

Decided May 20, 1935

295 U.S. 441

Syllabus

1. An attack upon a statute upon the ground that it is in violation "of the Constitution of the United States," without further specification, does not raise a federal question. P. 295 U. S. 442.

2. A ruling of a state trial court sustaining an indictment against preliminary attack, which the Supreme Court of the state declined to consider because the ruling was not preserved in a bill of exceptions or assigned as error, as required by the settled state practice, cannot be considered here, upon review of the latter court's judgment, as a basis for raising a federal question. P. 295 U. S. 443.

3. An attempt to raise a federal question before a state supreme court upon a petition for rehearing after judgment is too late unless the court actually entertains the question and decides it. P. 295 U. S. 443.

4. But a federal question first presented to the state court by petition for rehearing is in time if it could not have been raised earlier because the ruling of that court to which it is directed could not have been anticipated. P. 295 U. S. 444.

5. A ruling is not to be regarded as unanticipated by the party where it is one that follows an earlier decision of the same court in a similar case. P. 295 U. S. 446.

Appeal from 178 Ga. 832, 174 S.E. 597; 179 Ga. 597, 176 S.E. 620, dismissed.

Appeal from the affirmance of a conviction under an indictment charging Herndon with an attempt to incite insurrection by endeavoring to induce others to join in combined resistance to the authority of the state in violation of § 56 of the Penal Code of Georgia. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 295 U. S. 442





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED