CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


HILL V. WAMPLER, 298 U. S. 460 (1936)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 298 U. S. 460 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Hill v. Wampler, 298 U.S. 460 (1936)

Hill v. Wampler

No. 847

Argued May 4, 1936

Decided May 18, 1936

298 U.S. 460

Syllabus

1. A federal court imposing a fine in a criminal case may, in its discretion, direct that the defendant be imprisoned until the fine is paid; such direction, being an exercise of the judicial function, must be expressed in the sentence. P. 298 U. S. 463.

2. The only sentence known to the law is the sentence entered upon the records of the court -- the judgment. P. 298 U. S. 464.

3. If a sentence has been entered inaccurately, it may be corrected in a direct proceeding, but, when assailed collaterally, it imports verity, and the presumption that it says what the judge meant is irrebuttable. P. 298 U. S. 464.

4. A commitment departing in matter of substance from the judgment back of it is void, and its nullity may be established upon habeas corpus. P. 298 U. S. 465.

5. To a sentence of fine and imprisonment was added by the commitment prepared by the Clerk a direction that the imprisonment continue until the fine was paid.

Held:

(1) That such addition to the sentence could not be justified by a usage in the District or by unrecorded instructions from the judge to the clerk. P. 298 U. S. 465. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 298 U. S. 461

(2) An order of the court refusing to strike the added direction from the commitment was not binding, as res judicata, in a proceeding by habeas corpus to test the legality of the continued confinement after the term specified in the sentence had expired. P. 298 U. S. 466.

Response to questions certified in relation to an appeal to the court below from a judgment of the District Court, 11 F.Supp. 540, discharging the relator on habeas corpus.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED