CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


AMERICAN PROPELLER & MFG. CO. V. UNITED STATES, 300 U. S. 475 (1937)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 300 U. S. 475 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

American Propeller & Mfg. Co. v. United States, 300 U.S. 475 (1937)

American Propeller & Manufacturing Co. v. United States

No. 605

Argued March 12, 1937

Decided March 29, 1937

300 U.S. 475

Syllabus

1. In a suit in the Court of Claims, a recovery by the United States on a counterclaim, which is clearly unjust and inequitable to the claimant, should not be allowed unless under plain compulsion of law. P. 300 U. S. 478.

2. Interest upon the Government's counterclaim for taxes, under the circumstances of this case, should not have been allowed. P. 300 U. S. 478.

In 1924, the Government was indebted to a claimant in the sum of $119,413.04, against which there was at the same time a just counterclaim of $82,701.29. The inequity of allowing the Government chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 300 U. S. 476

interest for 12 years thereafter, so as to bring the claimant in debt to the Government in the sum of over $21,000, is so gross as to be shocking.

3. The opinion of the Court of Claims may be referred to in order to clarify the meaning of a finding which otherwise would be in doubt. P. 300 U. S. 479.

4. It is unnecessary to remand a case to the Court of Claim for the purpose of clarifying a finding as to whether there was compliance with § 250(e) of the Revenue Act of 1918, making "notice and demand by the collector" prerequisite to the allowance of interest on unpaid taxes, where the finding, the pleadings, and the opinion of the court, taken together, clearly show that the section was not complied with. P. 300 U. S. 480.

5. Nor ought the case to be remanded on the mere chance that the Government may be able to furnish evidence which it failed to furnish in a decade of litigation, and especially in respect of a claim which at the bar the Government frankly conceded to be inequitable. P. 300 U. S. 480.

83 Ct.Cls. 100, 14 F.Supp. 168, reversed.

Certiorari, post, p. 648, to review a judgment against the claimant in a suit against the United States upon certain contracts, wherein the Government asserted a counterclaim for taxes.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED