US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for


Subscribe to Cases that cite 310 U. S. 32 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Veix v. Sixth Ward Building & Loan Assn., 310 U.S. 32 (1940)

Veix v. Sixth Ward Building & Loan Association of Newark

No. 567

Argued March 6, 1940

Decided April 22, 1940

310 U.S. 32


1. On appeal under Jud.Code § 237(a) from a judgment of a state court sustaining the constitutionality of a state statute, this Court does not consider the application of later amendatory statutes which were not considered by the state court in its opinion. P. 310 U. S. 36.

2. For the sake of safeguarding the solvency of building and loan associations in the public interest, a state legislature may, independently of emergency and consistently with the contract clause of the Constitution, restrict the rights of certificate holders, existing under statutory regulations in force when they acquired their certificates, to withdraw or recover by suit the amounts of their certificates. P. 310 U. S. 38.

3. When the plaintiff purchased his certificates, the statutes of New Jersey permitted him to withdraw upon written notice and provided that withdrawals should be paid in the order in which notices were received at least one-half of the receipts in any chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 310 U. S. 33

month being assigned to this purpose; if not paid in six months, the shareholder could recover withdrawal value by suit. The amendatory Act, here sustained, defined the receipts from one-half of which withdrawals were to be satisfied, provided that if, in any month, the funds payable for withdrawals were insufficient to pay all withdrawing members, they were to receive $500 each in the order of priority until the fund for withdrawals was exhausted; withdrawal payments were subordinated to payment of matured shares, and, so long as the funds of an association were applied as required by the amendment, no member could sue for the withdrawal value of his shares. Pp. 310 U. S. 34-36.

123 N.J.L. 356, 8 A.2d 350, affirmed.

Appeal from the affirmance of a judgment dismissing the complaint in the suit brought by Veix against the Building & Loan Association to recover the amount of his paid up shares, with interest. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 310 U. S. 34

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™