US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for


Subscribe to Cases that cite 318 U. S. 322 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Helvering v. American Dental Co., 318 U.S. 322 (1943)

Helvering v. American Dental Co.

No. 303

Argued January 5, 6, 1943

Decided March 1, 1943

318 U.S. 322


1. The finding of the Board of Tax Appeals that the cancellation of indebtedness in question occurred in 1937 is accepted here. P. 318 U. S. 324.

2. The term "gift" in § 22(b)(3) of the Revenue Act of 1936 denotes the receipt of financial advantages gratuitously. P. 318 U. S. 330.

3. A cancellation of items of indebtedness owed by a corporation (rent and interest on notes), though the items had been accrued and served to offset income in prior years, and though the corporation was solvent, held, under § 22(b)(3) of the Revenue Act of 1936, a "gift" exempt from federal income tax. P. 318 U. S. 330.

4. A finding of the Board of Tax Appeals that the debt cancellation in question was not a "gift" within the meaning of § 22(b)(3) of the Revenue Act of 1936 is not conclusive here, because the Board chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 318 U. S. 323

reached its conclusion by application of erroneous legal standards. P. 318 U. S. 330.

5. That the motives for cancellation of indebtedness were those of business, or even selfish, is of no significance in determining whether there was a "gift" under § 22(b)(3). P. 318 U. S. 331.

128 F.2d 254 affirmed.

Certiorari, 317 U.S. 612, to review the reversal of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, 44 B.T.A. 425, sustaining a determination of deficiency in income tax.

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™